20080312

can microsoft use up any more space?

so i bought myself a new laptop with vista on it about a month ago. it came with a hard drive that's been partitioned into two logical drives, each about equal in size. and i've been gradually loading it with the various softwares that i use, with the intention of transitioning to a laptop permanently instead of using my desktop as my main computer.

tonight i happened to notice that my c: drive is at near capacity at around 45 gigs leaving only 5 gigs left. what? i know i didn't load that much sofware and my data files amount to no more than 100 mb. so i began to tally up the sizes of each and every folder on the root directory.

seeing that the "Users" directory is about 20 gigs raised a huge alarm in my head. like i said, i have about 100 mb in data files that are on the c: drive (i make it a point to save all my data files on the d: drive or an external drive). at first, i couldn't find the source of the files that used up the 20 gigs. then i remember that there is a hidden folder for each user, called "Application Data" in winxp, with its equivalent named "AppData" in vista.

it's normally hidden. so i go into Tools>Folder Options at the drop down menu and selected the option to show hidden files/folders. eureka....once the AppData folder showed itself, i drilled further into it (C:\Users\Hue Tang\AppData\Local\Temp). this temp folder holds 20 gigs of files that should have been deleted when its usefullness has come to an end. but every useless file stuck around. unbelievable. deleted the contents and i've just reclaimed more than a third of my c: drive.

microsoft, if you are listening, this may be another reason why people don't want to use vista. even though hard drive space is cheap, it doesn't mean that there is an endless supply, especially on a laptop. what are you thinking?

and on another matter, why do you schedule things to happen in the middle of the night? do you actually expect people to leave their computers on 24/7? in this time and age when people are trying to conserve energy and do all they can to save the planet, you aren't doing anything to help. you don't manufacture a lot of hardware, but in my opinion, you are one of the worst polluters on the planet for not adopting the right attitude. you're presence is widespread enough that if everyone left their computers on at 2 am for updates, this planet is sure to be in a worse situation overnight.

20080305

you, too, can be green

start by sending electronic payments to pay your bills instead of writing checks. most banks even encourage that you pay your bills through your bank instead of writing checks, so much so that they make it free for you to do so. this reduces on the number of trees being cut down just so that they can make the paper used to print your checks. and this also reduces on the use of fuel by the postal service for delivering your payment.

next, if your creditors offer it, and most do, opt to not receive a bill in the mail. have them notify you by email. you'll most likely be able to login to the site to check out the bill if you so choose. my electrical service, gas service, home telephone, and cell phone service no longer send me "snail mail". the four companies all send me emails, telling me how much i owe on a monthly basis. then i just jump on the net, login to my bank account, and authorize my bank to make electronic payments to the appropriate payees.

but because i want to look at my credit card transactions more closely, i opted to still receive paper bills from my credit card companies. however, payments are still made electronically. i'm hoping to make the full transition soon to not get any paper bills at all in the mail.

i recycle all glass and plastic containers. and it doesn't matter if you don't get much out of it. i don't. they all rest in a large bag in my garage. when it fills up, i leave it next to the trash bin for someone else to pick up or for the trash collection people to pick up. even though i don't get any cash back for my efforts, i know that someone else, and more importantly, the planet, benefits.

and don't leave the water running while you are brushing your teeth. same goes for washing dishes. and finally, turn off the lights when it's not needed. and transition to compact fluorescent bulbs to further cut down on the use of electricity. they also last so much longer than regular incandescent light bulbs.

these are some of the simple things you can do that doesn't require that you spend money to be green. in fact, they save you money. the compact fluorescent bulbs may cost more per bulb, but they pay for themselves within a couple months in the form of a reduce electric bill. they also last much longer, so you don't have to buy replacements so quickly.

20080304

10 times faster vs. 10 times as fast

i have a problem with people, especially those who are the technical fields and those who report on technical things, when they tout that something new is "10 times faster" than the original.

let's take the next generation of usb speed, for instance. it is speculated that after usb 2, the generation of usb devices will perform a 4800 kbps, as opposed to 480 kbps for usb 2. here's my problem. tech people are saying that this is 10 times "faster" when in fact it is 10 times "as fast".

there is a difference. let's take an example. if i travel 10 miles at the rate of 10 miles per hour, i would have arrived in 1 hour. another person covers the same distance in 10 hours traveling at a much slower pace of 1 mile per hour. in this case, i would have arrived 9 hours earlier, not 10. substitute "faster" for "earlier" it makes a lot of sense. to say it the other way, i would have traveled 10 times as fast, not 10 times faster.

10 times faster than 1 mile per hour is actually 11 miles per hour.

to put it yet another way, we commonly hear that something is "twice as fast" as something else. you would have no trouble figuring out that if i traveled at 5 miles per hour, twice as fast is 10 miles per hour. notice that hardly anyone says "two times faster".

the same concept applies for "more" vs "as much". just ask yourself if you would rather have twice as much as your current salary or two times more. example: i make $1 an hour. making twice as much is making $2 an hour whereas making two times more would imply 2 times more than the original.

original = $1.
two times original = $2.

two times more than original <=> two times original + original <=> $2 + $1 = $3.

so think about the terms you should be using the next time you have a comparison such as this. i can only say that technical people should know better and people who report on tech issues should know as well.